As sports media critic for the Tampa Bay Times, Tom Jones dishes out scrutiny on a regular basis. Why Joe even once found himself on the wrong end of a jaded, misguided Jones hate piece.
So given that Jones is a media analyst, Joe suspects Jones would appreciate having the spotlight shined back on him.
Yesterday, Jones was a guest of Tom Krasniqi of WHBO-AM 1040 and proceeded to give muddled and somewhat bizarre takes on the state of LeGarrette Blount and the potential drafting of Trent Richardson. Joe transcribed verbatim, therefore not protecting the innocent.
Tom Jones: I think there’s a lot of things you look on tape that you probably not enamored about when you look at LeGarrette Blount. Look, he performed better than a lot of people thought he would last season, but there are also some moments. And you’ve heard the stories out there that he’s not a terribly bright guy as far as what to do in an offense, that he’s pretty limited in what he’s capable of doing and what you’re capable of doing with him. So, um, you know, if it’s a situation where, look, defenses are smart out there. If they know that your running back can only do a couple of things, then it’s easy to stop that. So, I think they’re in a situation right now where, again, I think this is what it comes down to is, ‘Can we live with LeGarrette Blount at running back and take somebody else at No. 5? Or is it such a weakness at running back that we absolutely have to have a running back to run our system?’ If so, you know, we take that. It would be so much easier if the Bucs, really for them, if they had the 15th pick and there were a couple of running backs or a couple of, you know, offensive linemen, whatever, sticking around at that spot. But if you have the No. 5 pick, you can’t miss. You have to get this right. Especially with as many holes as this team has. So, I think that’s really what it comes down to, ‘Is it worth taking a running back at No. 5 or can you live with LeGarrette Blount for another year or two?'”
Where should Joe start?
First, Jones stating Blount “performed better than a lot of people thought he would last season” is inaccurate, though Joe suspects somebody somewhere joins Jones in believing Blount overachieved in 2011.
Second, Jones referencing phantom “stories” of Blount’s lack of intelligence is reckless and irrelevant. Blount churned up 1,000 yards on five yards per carry during his 2010 rookie season as a guy thrown into the Bucs offense off the waiver wire in September. One could make a case that Blount learned damn quickly, but that’s not the point.
It’s a coaching staff’s job to get the best out of its players. If Jones is saying Blount is too dumb to master a playbook or develop his overall game in a timely fashion, that still doesn’t mean Blount isn’t capable of tearing up the league if used properly, as he was for most of 2010. The guy caught 15 balls at 10 yards a catch last season. Does Blount really need a solid Wonderlic score to catch 30 or more if the Bucs actually threw him the ball to free him up in open space? Mike Alstott averaged 28 catches a year at 7.5 yards a pop.
Lastly, Jones’ draft analysis, um, speaks for itself.
Jones and others in the media have a negative vibe about Blount that Joe just doesn’t share. Joe’s never seen a guy like Blount, who’s had great success playing his first two seasons as the Bucs’ No. 1 offensive weapon, get chewed up so badly by analysts and writers.
Blount was one of the greatest stories in the NFL in 2010, and he went into the record books as only the second undrafted rookie to rack up 1,000 yards. Last year, he had some fumbling woes but was simply misused by a Bucs coaching staff that fell apart and lost the team.
Joe’s just getting really tired of senseless reviews of Blount’s performance and ability.