
One NFL writer trashes Luke Kuechly by claiming he's just another Barrett Ruud.
For the first time Joe can ever remember, he just wants to hide somewhere away from any draft information until the beers begin pouring at Joe’s draft party Thursday night.
The speculating, posturing and — dare Joe say? — lying has reached crazy proportions.
All of a sudden yesterday, Joe heard things that made the antennae jump out of Joe’s head. For weeks, months, all Joe heard was that USC tackle Matt Kalil was an all-World offensive tackle, a franchise stud.
Now, thanks to a secretive offensive line coach talking (planting?) information to Pat Kirwan like Deep Throat, hiding in a parking garage in the dark of the night, all of a sudden Kalil is a no-good bum and another Robert Gallery?
Last night Tuna Parcells, who never won a championship without Bill Belicheat at his side, claims Alabama safety Mark Barron is a “box safety,” thus is not a first-rounder?
Parcells, a pillar of honesty, wouldn’t be playing BSPN so one of his boys still in the league (Jerry Jones, Belicheat, Tom Coughlin) might benefit from Barron sliding thanks to getting shat on from Parcells, on national TV no less, would he?
Where was all of this talk at the Senior Bowl?
Another crazy item comes from Andy Benoit of the New York Times. He recently Twittered about Boston College linebacker Luke Kuechly.
Benoit is an avowed Barrett Ruud hater. To Benoit, Ruud is a walking version of an Ebola virus. When stuck for something to write, Benoit salves his inner writer’s cramp and will type many dozens of words about how Ruud has stained the soil of NFL playing fields.
Now Benoit is trying to sully the name of Kuechly by comparing him to a young version of Ruud.
@Andy_Benoit: In the very, very little I’ve seen of Luke Kuechly, he seemed like a faster Barrett Ruud (not a compliment).
Couple of things: First, this comparison is nearly as bad as Benoit’s attempt to document how baseball is dead. Strange, the game has never been better, financially. Eh, an annoying fact.
But trying to cut the knees out from Kuechly because he is another Ruud is crazy on many levels.
Now Joe knows many Bucs fans hated Ruud as well because they wanted Ruud to be a Jack Lambert-type when that is not the position he played in a Tampa-2 defense (there’s another one of those irritating facts).
So Kuechly is rotten because he covers receivers well and racks up tackles like Joe does beers on a Friday night, all of which were traits of Ruud (not the beers)? My, how horrible of a linebacker that is!
Or is Benoit irritated that Kuechly is white?
If, as Benoit suggests, Ruud was so miserable, how is it — just as Tim Ryan of SiriusXM NFL Radio correctly predicted — the Bucs defense totally collapsed to a historic franchise low without him. The Bucs linebackers unit may very have been the worst in the NFL.
If, again, as Benoit believes, Ruud was so pathetic, shouldn’t the Bucs linebacker play have improved without him? No?
At least Joe gives many props to Benoit for being honest and claiming he hasn’t really watched Kuechly play.
But this is the silly season (on steroids) we are in, where nothing is really to be believed on face value.
Damn, the clock can’t begin to start soon enough for the Colts to satisfy Joe.