Adam Schefter: “I Don’t Think [Baker Mayfield] Is Going To Hit The Market”

August 4th, 2026

Update.

There are several reasons Joe has been so confident that Baker Mayfield will still be taking snaps for the Bucs.

One, everything Joe has heard both on and off the record is that neither the Bucs nor Mayfield want a split in their relationship.

Another? Bucs AC/DC-loving general manager Jason Licht has the franchise tag in his back pocket.

Last week when Mayfield teed off frustrated about not having a new deal and the Bucs subsequently let it be known through their proxy Adam Schefter that they weren’t too kosher with Mayfield fudging on the numbers they offered him, Schefter then appeared on Pat McAfee’s show and said the Bucs weren’t going to let Mayfield hit the free agent market in March.

Today, Schefter doubled down on that belief, again using McAfee’s show as a platform.

“I don’t think he is going to hit the market,” Schefter said of Mayfield. “That doesn’t mean Tampa and Baker can’t get a deal worked out or they won’t get a deal worked out.

“But Tampa has the franchise tag next year. … When you have that tag, it gives you a little bit of leverage.”

Schefter then said he’s not buying Mayfield’s self-imposed deadline of the start of training camp is a concrete lock, which Mayfield himself cracked the door open to last week.

Schefter said he doesn’t believe it’s impossible the Bucs and Mayfield could reach a deal around Labor Day.

Yes, this is what Joe and Ira have said for months on the “Ira Kaufman Podcast.” While Mayfield may not be involved, his agent sure is.

Are we really to believe if Licht calls up Mayfield’s agent, capitulates and tells Mayfield’s agent, “Look, we will give you what you want,” Mayfield would nix the deal, saying, “I told you my deadline was July 30, eff off!”

Of course not.

29 Responses to “Adam Schefter: “I Don’t Think [Baker Mayfield] Is Going To Hit The Market””

  1. Thomas Says:

    “One of the reasons Joe has been so confident that Bucs quarterback Baker Mayfield will still be taking snaps for the Bucs as their starting quarterback in 2027 is for several reasons.”

    One of the reasons is for several reasons. Either way to little or way too much AI involved in that sentence, Joe, lol.

  2. The Fighting Schianoes Says:

    3 year, 165, get it done Licht and Team Glazer.

    That’ll look like a bargain believe me.

  3. Smashsquatcht Says:

    Bucs hold all the cards. They can pay him $40/$50/$55 over three years using the tag & his current deal. That’s $145 over three years with a ton of flexibility, meaning they can pull the rip cord on Baker after one, two or three years based on how he plays. And the point about Todd being on thin ice is real. Should they bail on Bowles, no problem for the next coach regardless if he wants to keep Baker or not. This flexibility makes the job more attractive. Paying him anything north of that is unnecessarily risky.

  4. #1bucsfan Says:

    Baker fan here but personally I’d rather for the Bucs to wait till the end of the season and then make a decision. It’s a prove it year for baker. Many will disagree but we can all agree he’s bin inconsistent. It would suck if the Bucs break the bank and he has another terrible 2nd half season at the same time if he has a season like 24 then the price goes up and it should and people will say oh they should have signed him when he was cheaper well guess what no one can see into the future

  5. Football 1 Says:

    Sign the Man!!!. Really he not going to take less years would put money on that

  6. Beeej Says:

    Baker will be the QB in ’27 because there is LITERALLY no one else

  7. Wyoming Joe Says:

    After the numbers that Baker has put up over the last three years, why does he have to prove himself again? Don’t blame the train wreck from the second half of last year only on Baker because that just isn’t fair. And even his haters know it.

  8. Critmark Says:

    @ Smashsquatcht

    Your numbers are close but just a bit of modification. Per OverTheCap.com: “$50.3 million for 2027 and an increased sequential rate of approximately $60.4 million for 2028”

    Adding his current deal: $40/$50.3/$60.4 = $150.7M. Also remember that if they tag him in 2027, they have to accelerate his dead money to 2027 making the cap hit $80M!

    That said, your point is well taken. The Bucs can pull the plug at any time if they go this route. That is why Baker is not happy. He has absolutely zero security. But that is the way the CBA is structured and the Bucs can go this route if they so choose.

    My question is, if they choose to go this route aren’t saying they don’t believe Baker is their future? If so, why not trade him now, get some added assets for a draft next year which is expected to be very good, lose more games so the picks that are theirs are higher choices? Same with VV!

  9. BuccoMarty Says:

    Beeej Says:
    August 4th, 2026 at 1:34 pm
    Baker will be the QB in ’27 because there is LITERALLY no one else
    ______________________

    This is accurate.

    I can see them drafting a rookie (possibly even in the first round to keep Baker pissed), but it’s going to be Baker.

  10. MelvinJunior Says:

    NO. Hold. The. Line. Not one-more YEAR. Not a DIME MORE. Just put a wrap on it, and say, “we’re good playing-out this season FIRST.”

  11. zzbucs Says:

    I don’t mind if BM is gone in 2027.

    I wouldn’t pay him as an elite when he is not.

    There are gonna be qb on the draft and on free agency…..

    My concern is VV, I would pay for him and not for BM

  12. Coltol Says:

    Is it possible that the bucs are are concerned that they may (somewhat likely) have a new coach and they want to leave some flexibility at the QB position

  13. First Last Says:

    That isnt how the tag works smashsquatch. It would be like ~48 million then 140% of that

  14. srqbuc Says:

    I dont think anyone has mentioned that there is a void year on the end of bakers contract. If he is franchise tagged next year the cap hit for the void year would be around 30 mil plus 50 mil for the tag. looking at a 80 mil cap hit next year with the franchise tag. The tag would just be to buy time to negotiate a long term deal.

  15. Mobucs Says:

    If the injury-prone Baker is not signed and gets a owie, he can sit down the rest of the season while everyone watches to see the Bucs flounder without him and other teams can prepare their offers for 2027. And no one can criticize because they all said that if he gets hurt, he should not be playing. And the Bucs would find it hard to pay franchise money to someone they don’t think is a franchise quarterback.

  16. Buccaneer Bonzai Says:

    This just convinces me they plan to replace Bowles next year. I’m purely guessing here, but I think it’s Tomlin.

    A 2 year extension is acceptable to a new coach…that’s why Mayfield wants 3+ years. He wants to know he still has a job when Bowles is fired.

    I cannot really blame him there.

  17. Buccaneer Bonzai Says:

    Mobucs Says:
    “If the injury-prone Baker…”

    He might get injured, but he still plays. Usually just as good, but last year was a disaster all around. Just means he isn’t Superman.

  18. Critmark Says:

    zzbucs Says: There are gonna be qb on the draft and on free agency…..

    I agree that this seems to be the Bucs chosen course. I have asked before but let me do it again. The why keep Baker for 2026? If the team thinks this is a SB caliber roster with Baker, then pay him. But clearly they don’t. So what is the real benefit of keeping him. Get some assets for him now, lose more game, get better draft position.

    If they want to hold on to him in case they are wrong about him, then get a new GM and HC now as well. They seem to want to be half pregnant.

  19. Rod Munch Says:

    Critmark Says:
    That is why Baker is not happy. He has absolutely zero security.

    ———-

    Baker is 2-11 in primetime and playoff games since 2023.

    Baker lost 4 games in a row last year with the playoffs on the line.

    Baker played like such trash last year he got the entire offensive staff fired.

    Baker lacks security, because he played like garbage when it mattered most. It’s 100% on him.

    Baker is under contract, makes $40M this year, and if he performs, he’s going to get paid huge money. If Baker plays like the Baker last year, that cost the Bucs the playoffs, was so bad he made Evans flee to the other side of the country to get away from him, then Baker will be gone, and everyone will be fired.

  20. BucsfaninOregon Says:

    Early season $$standoffs are normal in the NFL. But, last minute deals before first game is stupid. VV will pull a muscle in game 1 or 2 due to no training camo, guaranteed.

  21. Fanofdabucs Says:

    There is only one scenario where Baker hits the market.

    That would be where the Bucs finish with a losing record and Baker doesn’t play well.

    In that scenario Bowles would be fired and the new regime would decide what they want to do at QB.

    If that scenario plays out AND the new coaching staff decides to move on from Baker..he hits the open market.

    I dont see it playing out that way.

    There is no reason for JL to cave to any demands right now. Baker is under contract and he really controls his own destiny with how he plays this year.

  22. 813bucboi Says:

    baker is outta here…let em walk!!!!

    SIGN VITA!!!!

    GO BUCS!!!!!

  23. Crickett Baker Says:

    It seems Baker has done something like this on every team that he has been on. It’s very weird how he seems to consistently push at the teams, coaches, and owners at some point. The results have been that he has been cut every time. I suggest you read this:” https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/32559762/the-story-how-baker-mayfield-odell-beckham-jr-field-browns-relationship-fell-apart“. It gives a lot of info about his character.

    I don’t think just giving him everything he wants is the right move.

  24. Critmark Says:

    @ Rod Munch – I made no assertion that it was anyone’s fault, I was merely pointing out a fact, he has no security. If you want to put the entire blame on him, go for it.

    I do find it funny however that all the Baker haters blame everything on Baker. You want to blame Evans departure on Baker, yet in Evans presser he praised everyone associated with the Bucs, EXCEPT the coaches. All the while saying how great the SF coaching staff is. Yep, that’s obviously Bakers fault.

    On this very site, along with many others, there were comments that some players on the D quit last year, or at a minimum took plays off. Bowles even spoke about it. Yep, that’s obviously Bakers fault.

    After the bye last year, the Offense scored around 4 points/game less and the defense allowed around 4 points/game. Those 4 points from either the O or D could have swung 4 losses the other way. Again, the D allowing 4 points/game more was Baker’s fault.

    So I am clear, I think the Bucs want nothing to do with Baker long term, and as such I think they should trade him now. Get some assets for him now because if he plays as it seems you think he will this year, they let him walk and get nothing.

  25. Buddha Says:

    Here are the Super Bowl winning Quarterbacks the last eight years:

    Darnold
    Hurts
    Maholmes
    Maholmes
    Stafford
    Brady
    Maholmes
    Brady

    Hurts and Donald are not elite. None had played less than three years. Stafford had played a dozen. Nobody thought of Darnold or Hurts as among the top dozen quarterbacks in the league. If the Buccaneers were to dump Baker you can expect a decade of mediocrity. Prescott, Burrow, Allen, Jackson, Herbert. They are media darlings but they fail year after year after year.

  26. Baker2Emeka Says:

    that’s one reason Baker has to be careful what he says. Bucs are actually sort of smart. They have him for one season guaranteed and if he gets injured they are off the hook (he runs enough and puts his body on the line that he is prone to injury). if he doesn’t get injured, then they try to negotiate wiht him and if that fails, they tag him with franchise tag. so he is staying in Tampa x 3 years at least and should not be sour. only thing is, he has no protection if he gets injured but thats life. he is rich enough already in general.

  27. Baker2Emeka Says:

    Rod Munch:
    agree he needs to do better in primetime. BUT you have it backwards, Grizz and offensive staff were so bad they drove Evans away (he is done with 1st year OC’s) and Baker had a good but not great year and Bucs failed cause of them (and cause of Defense). Under Coen and Canales, Offense was good. but they were 1st timers……

  28. Critmark Says:

    I keep reading how the Bucs are smart to not pay him now because they can tag him if he plays well. Just for fun, let’s play a ’what if’ game here.

    Scenario 1 – The Bucs miss the playoffs: Irrespective of how Baker plays, assuming if he plays lights out, they make the playoffs, they let him walk. I don’t see the Bucs paying him $50M with an $80M cap hit if they miss the playoffs. The Bucs get nothing in return.

    Scenario 2 – The Bucs make the playoffs but lose on the first round: Even if Baker has a really good year, I think the Bucs decision is the same as scenario 1 – they let him walk. The Bucs get nothing in return. Tell me if you think I am wrong here.

    Scenario 3 – The Bucs lose in the NFC Championship game: This gets tough. I don’t think the Bucs will step up with a long-term deal that Baker will accept. I could be wrong, but I just don’t think the Bucs want Baker long term. So, they tag him, take the $80M cap hit, and hope for the best.

    Scenario 4 – The Bucs lose in the SB: Again, a tough call. But I think I am going with the same scenario as scenario 3. They tag him, eat the $80M cap hit and ride it out one more year.

    Scenario 5 – The Bucs with Baker win the SB: The Bucs are forced to offer a real extension at a rate more than they want for longer than they want with more guarantees than they want. If they don’t Baker will be tagged and will never sign another non-tag contract with the Bucs…ever!

    Given these scenarios, and the belief among most of the participants here that this is not a SB ready roster, what exactly is the ‘win’ for the Bucs here? The most likely outcome is he walks away and the Bucs get nothing in return.

  29. CosmoKramer Says:

    Joe was uber confident Mike Evans was going to retire as a Buc for life.

    Now Joe is still trying to figure out why he left for less money and higher taxes.

    Despite ME13 giving clear and obvious answers for his departure to San Francisco.

    After crying like a little girl with a skinned knee over getting offered over $100 million dollars, Baker needs to go elsewhere and likely will.

 

Leave a Reply