Are The Redskins Worse Than The Bucs?

October 1st, 2009

Mike Wise and Jason Reid of the Washington Post, among others, discuss if the Washington Redskins are the worst team in the NFL. Joe defies anyone to watch this and then say with a straight face the soft local pen and mic club is “negative.”

These guys absolutely crucify the Redskins.

3 Responses to “Are The Redskins Worse Than The Bucs?”

  1. Pete Says:

    Have they had a starting QB gain 22yards? Has the Skins O gained less that 100 yards this year? Has the Skins D been gashed for 900+ yards?
    If you answered no to any of these questions then the likely answer is = no not currently.

    They know who the starting QB is and the Redskins D is not getting sliced up like watermelons on a hot day.

    Only place where the equal each other is in coaching.

    Win and then perhaps they are.

  2. Joe Says:

    the Redskins D is not getting sliced up like watermelons on a hot day

    LOL good line!

  3. Dave Says:

    In Game 2, the Redskins beat the Rams, which I think clearly shows that the Rams are worse. The Redskins are bad, but they are not worse than the Rams or Browns. If healthy, the Bucs have every chance to beat the Redskins, barring a disaster like last week. I look forward to watching Josh Johnson.