<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drew Rosenhaus Is Salivating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joebucsfan.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=79804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:20:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomcin</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2692255</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomcin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2692255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobody mentions Te&#039;o Neosheim who I think is an up &amp; coming DE with a good future ahead of him. He&#039;ll only get better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody mentions Te&#8217;o Neosheim who I think is an up &amp; coming DE with a good future ahead of him. He&#8217;ll only get better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigMacAttack</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2691195</link>
		<dc:creator>BigMacAttack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2691195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Need a package deal for both Bennetts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need a package deal for both Bennetts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red86</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2687589</link>
		<dc:creator>Red86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 03:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2687589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would go with Osi or Avril. Both are better than Bennett IMO. If we don&#039;t get Bennett back, then we should get around a 4th round through 6th round complementary pick. Then pick up a McCoy tag team partner that can get off a single blocker often. The Defense will greatly improve by just fixing the front 7 alone.

Osi: http://youtu.be/6nlKDo_m694
Avril&quot; http://youtu.be/avobSO3e7Bg
Bennett: I tried to be fair but couldn&#039;t find any highlight for the guy that similar to the two above.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would go with Osi or Avril. Both are better than Bennett IMO. If we don&#8217;t get Bennett back, then we should get around a 4th round through 6th round complementary pick. Then pick up a McCoy tag team partner that can get off a single blocker often. The Defense will greatly improve by just fixing the front 7 alone.</p>
<p>Osi: <a href="http://youtu.be/6nlKDo_m694" rel="nofollow">http://youtu.be/6nlKDo_m694</a><br />
Avril&#8221; <a href="http://youtu.be/avobSO3e7Bg" rel="nofollow">http://youtu.be/avobSO3e7Bg</a><br />
Bennett: I tried to be fair but couldn&#8217;t find any highlight for the guy that similar to the two above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jglazer</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2687122</link>
		<dc:creator>jglazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 02:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2687122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bennett was average up until his contract year.  I don&#039;t see a long term up side.  Don&#039;t have the answer but don&#039;t think he deserves a million dollars for each sack this year.  There has to be something better than this guy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bennett was average up until his contract year.  I don&#8217;t see a long term up side.  Don&#8217;t have the answer but don&#8217;t think he deserves a million dollars for each sack this year.  There has to be something better than this guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigMacAttack</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2685982</link>
		<dc:creator>BigMacAttack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2685982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drew is the ultimate Capitalist Pig. I love that guy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew is the ultimate Capitalist Pig. I love that guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piratic</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2685906</link>
		<dc:creator>Piratic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2685906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Andrew 1
#71&#039;s sack total went up in 2012 simply because he gets better every year. Hell, he gets better every week. The pass rush is typically the hardest thing for any D-lineman, and therefore it&#039;s usually the last to develop.
#71 has always played the run very well, and Coach Schiano counts that as a priority, so it&#039;s very likely that he&#039;ll be a Buc for a while.
I agree that he is good, but not great. That being said, I feel he has the ABILITY to be great. His upside has yet to be determined.
Disagree &quot;weather&quot; or not we will be fine without him. I can&#039;t believe that you would even think that! Consider, for a moment, what the D-line would have looked like in 2012 without him. At the very least, our ability to stop the run is seriously compromised, and the bulk of the pass rush disappears.
For me, there are no red flags with #71.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew 1<br />
#71&#8242;s sack total went up in 2012 simply because he gets better every year. Hell, he gets better every week. The pass rush is typically the hardest thing for any D-lineman, and therefore it&#8217;s usually the last to develop.<br />
#71 has always played the run very well, and Coach Schiano counts that as a priority, so it&#8217;s very likely that he&#8217;ll be a Buc for a while.<br />
I agree that he is good, but not great. That being said, I feel he has the ABILITY to be great. His upside has yet to be determined.<br />
Disagree &#8220;weather&#8221; or not we will be fine without him. I can&#8217;t believe that you would even think that! Consider, for a moment, what the D-line would have looked like in 2012 without him. At the very least, our ability to stop the run is seriously compromised, and the bulk of the pass rush disappears.<br />
For me, there are no red flags with #71.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatmosh</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2685795</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatmosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2685795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bennett played very well last year too, he&#039;s not just a one-year wonder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bennett played very well last year too, he&#8217;s not just a one-year wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew 1</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2684528</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2684528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[50% chance we sign him. just all depends on how much we are willing to spend on an above average DE. anybody notice how Bennett&#039;s sack total blew up during a contract year? that makes me cautious about signing him. I think the guy is good, but not great. weather we sign him or not we will be fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>50% chance we sign him. just all depends on how much we are willing to spend on an above average DE. anybody notice how Bennett&#8217;s sack total blew up during a contract year? that makes me cautious about signing him. I think the guy is good, but not great. weather we sign him or not we will be fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatmosh</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2684297</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatmosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2684297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, no, no. Why would we let Bennett go then sign another DE in FA??

There is no possible way, given how good Bennett is, that another guy could come in here and produce at his level right away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no, no. Why would we let Bennett go then sign another DE in FA??</p>
<p>There is no possible way, given how good Bennett is, that another guy could come in here and produce at his level right away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2684264</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2684264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I view Michael Johnson as the best pure DE pass rusher.  A 6&#039;7 270 lber with legit 4.65 speed and athleticism, his upside is still untapped.

My preference is Paul Kruger of Baltimore because of his schematic versatility. Technically a LB with the Ravens, Kruger puts his hand in the dirt well over 50 of the time with his team and is a constantly disruptive force.  If we signed him he could play the Sam on running downs and move to DE on passing downs.  He might offer us the most bang for our bucks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I view Michael Johnson as the best pure DE pass rusher.  A 6&#8217;7 270 lber with legit 4.65 speed and athleticism, his upside is still untapped.</p>
<p>My preference is Paul Kruger of Baltimore because of his schematic versatility. Technically a LB with the Ravens, Kruger puts his hand in the dirt well over 50 of the time with his team and is a constantly disruptive force.  If we signed him he could play the Sam on running downs and move to DE on passing downs.  He might offer us the most bang for our bucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2684246</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2684246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bennett and Avril are good but neither will be the catch of this season&#039;s free agency class.  Michael Johnson of Cincy is likely to get the most money. Paul Kruger of Baltimore, with his play in the last 10 games, is steadily driving his guaranteed money up.  Connor Barwin of Houston, might not make as much as the other four, but he will be getting a nice contract once he hits the open market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bennett and Avril are good but neither will be the catch of this season&#8217;s free agency class.  Michael Johnson of Cincy is likely to get the most money. Paul Kruger of Baltimore, with his play in the last 10 games, is steadily driving his guaranteed money up.  Connor Barwin of Houston, might not make as much as the other four, but he will be getting a nice contract once he hits the open market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatmosh</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804&#038;cpage=1#comment-2684106</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatmosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=79804#comment-2684106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bennett played 89% of the snaps on D this year, almost 1,000 snaps.

COMBINED Bowers and Clayborn played less than 500 snaps. Getting these two back at 100% next year, plus re-signing Bennett would hopefully give us the defensive line we&#039;ve been hoping for for the past two years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bennett played 89% of the snaps on D this year, almost 1,000 snaps.</p>
<p>COMBINED Bowers and Clayborn played less than 500 snaps. Getting these two back at 100% next year, plus re-signing Bennett would hopefully give us the defensive line we&#8217;ve been hoping for for the past two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.joebucsfan.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=79804 ) in 0.18780 seconds, on May 23rd, 2013 at 10:35 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2013 at 11:35 pm UTC -->