Comments on: Bucs 27, Panthers 21 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178 Just another WordPress weblog Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Bobby http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2270537 Bobby Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:07:36 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2270537 That’s why I wait to comment until the game is over most of the time. So many of the comments are lame knee jerk reactions that are just stupid. I was down on Freeman at the beginning of the year but since the bye week he has alleviated any doubts I had. They took the restraints off and he has been stellar. Matt Ryan threw 3 picks today. Think anyone cares? It’s all about the W.

]]> By: Fritz50 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2270193 Fritz50 Sun, 18 Nov 2012 23:30:27 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2270193 “they can have Talib”

I think this is one of those ‘good for all parties’ things. I think Coach had Aquib on the right track BUT he fell one too many times. Mayhap the Pats can get him straight, & more power to them. As for the fumble, I agree, but once thw zebras called a fumble on the field the replay officials hands were tied, there had to be clear & conclusive evidence to overturn, & I guess they just couldn’t see enough. Still & all, in My opinion, it’s really on the D, at that point, ’cause the Kitties only got the ball at their 20. It’s not like they turned it over at our end of the field.

]]> By: Biggun http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2270187 Biggun Sun, 18 Nov 2012 23:28:51 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2270187 @Hawaiian I know I guess my question is The Official Review team what was they reviewing? The turn over or td or both what is the procedure for this kind of thing caus they have to review two things manditory change of possession and scoring play… seeing as the play was called a turn over that’s what they reviewed had the ref call td the fumble review wuld not matter they would have to concentrate on did the ball break the plane I think they could not do this cause of the call catch 22…

]]> By: Hawaiian Buc http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2270155 Hawaiian Buc Sun, 18 Nov 2012 23:20:16 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2270155 I also agree that it was a TD, but I’m not surprised by the call at all. We are in Carolina, and we are the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. I believe the league mandates that all close calls must go against us, despite there being video evidence to prove otherwise. But seriously, because it was called a fumble and there was no conclusive angle because the stupid videographer didn’t adjust his camera when the ref got in his way, they just stuck with the call on the field. Still a bad call in my opinion, as I think there was enough evidence to overturn. Glad it didn’t cost us the game.

]]> By: Biggun http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2270147 Biggun Sun, 18 Nov 2012 23:16:53 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2270147 Ok I look at the the Martin so callled fumble 20 times slowmo frame by frame and I don’t get it… from either line judge camera’s you don’t see the ball out unitl after it breaks the plain so how the hell do the ref’s know to call it a fumble and touchback? I’ve seen several times in the past a ball carrier reachout to break plain and ball then comes out it’s still a TD…. I bet the Bucs get a letter from the officiating office they it was a bad call Thank God we won… I hate how many times we’ve been screwed on bad endzone calls over the years, I figured with a all scores reviewed this would curtail bad calls. So can someone explain why they called this when clearly the ball was not seen loose until it was completely in the endzone by a ref? I think they should have called a TD and let it be reviewed upstairs…. with the call they made the review was a turn over review because that’s what happened after breaking the plane of the endzone officials I think only rulled the turnover cause of the call on the field…. GO BUCS!!!!!!!!!

]]> By: MOBucs http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2270028 MOBucs Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:50:17 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2270028 Karma’s a bitch huh Carolina!

]]> By: lurker http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2269981 lurker Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:39:54 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2269981 explorer is great!

]]> By: Mikeck http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2269979 Mikeck Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:38:24 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2269979 Fine, they can have Talib. Probably get another game or two out of him before he gets suspended again. Everyone knows he is a good cb….it’s just that he has issues that the bucks didn’t want to deal with

]]> By: snook http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2269961 snook Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:34:19 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2269961 People still use internet explorer? Wow.

]]> By: FLBoyInDallas http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2269945 FLBoyInDallas Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:30:48 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2269945 @Buc Fan #238

I wouldn’t celebrate about Talib so soon. He just had an INT and returned it 59 yards for a TD. Pats fans are loving him so far.

]]> By: espo http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2269933 espo Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:26:45 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2269933 Why the play by play on Talib? Boring.

Bucs overcome a screwjob and didn’t need a miracle but earned a victory! that’s what I’m talkin about!

]]> By: Have A Nice Day http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178&cpage=1#comment-2269897 Have A Nice Day Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:19:59 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=78178#comment-2269897 Man! Dallas Clark showed up big today, huh?

]]>