<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;I Love What I See&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joebucsfan.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=74019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=74019</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facts Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=74019&#038;cpage=1#comment-2051487</link>
		<dc:creator>Facts Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=74019#comment-2051487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Giants winning the Super Bowl last season with a low-ranked running game has further devalued the running back position&quot;

This is a false belief.
The Giants had a bad OL and two injured RBs so the run production suffered. They did not intentionally devalue the run game. The passing game was forced to pick up the slack.
The Giants GM and Coaches all pre-season in interview after interview all stated that improving the run game was a major concern.

Not doing something well doesn&#039;t mean its devalued. The Giants would rather have a strong running game to have shorter 3rd downs...  they compensated by making more long 3rd down passes than any other team.
But they struggle in the red zone - as shown in the Tampa game. Without the strong running game, shorter fields means its tougher to throw for the TD as play action gets bitten on less.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Giants winning the Super Bowl last season with a low-ranked running game has further devalued the running back position&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a false belief.<br />
The Giants had a bad OL and two injured RBs so the run production suffered. They did not intentionally devalue the run game. The passing game was forced to pick up the slack.<br />
The Giants GM and Coaches all pre-season in interview after interview all stated that improving the run game was a major concern.</p>
<p>Not doing something well doesn&#8217;t mean its devalued. The Giants would rather have a strong running game to have shorter 3rd downs&#8230;  they compensated by making more long 3rd down passes than any other team.<br />
But they struggle in the red zone &#8211; as shown in the Tampa game. Without the strong running game, shorter fields means its tougher to throw for the TD as play action gets bitten on less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.joebucsfan.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=74019 ) in 0.16894 seconds, on May 25th, 2013 at 12:01 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 25th, 2013 at 1:01 am UTC -->