<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Slander Of LeGarrette Blount</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joebucsfan.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=72159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 07:21:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawaiian Buc</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1987939</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawaiian Buc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1987939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright Miguel, our little honeymoon is over.  Basically everything you just typed is absolutely ridiculous.  How can you possibly say Martin and Smith are the same thing?  Martin is so much quicker and more explosive, and has vision unlike any back we&#039;ve had in a long time.  He runs lower to the ground as well.  He may not be as fast as Smith, but fast is very overrated for a RB anyway.  You bring up the 3.6 ypc, but that is very misleading.  He&#039;s been the one installed in the short yardage situations, and he has gotten it. If you run from the one yard line and score, your ypc goes down.  Have you not noticed him springing several great runs this preseason?  Everyone else has.  And by saying he shouldn&#039;t get the job, then why would you give it to Blount?  What has he done in the preseason?  Are you going to give the job to Blount because of how he performed  2 years ago under a previous regime?  How does that make sense?  Putting Martin mainly on special teams is the single stupidest ideas in the history of ideas.  I&#039;m shaking my head in embarrassment for you. 

As for Mallett being a stud, heh?  Because he led a couple TD&#039;s against guys you will be ordering burgers from in a week?  So now you want to get rid of a player who has a great season under his belt 2 years ago, for an unproven player? That&#039;s a bit hypocritical don&#039;t you think?  So that logic applies only to RB&#039;s but not QB&#039;s?   Freeman hasn&#039;t looked great, but he hasn&#039;t been nearly as bad as everyone is making him out to be.  He has no turnovers, and he has led our team to the end zone.  He had a couple drops last game which hurt his numbers.  Yes he made a couple bad throws, but that&#039;s what preseason is for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright Miguel, our little honeymoon is over.  Basically everything you just typed is absolutely ridiculous.  How can you possibly say Martin and Smith are the same thing?  Martin is so much quicker and more explosive, and has vision unlike any back we&#8217;ve had in a long time.  He runs lower to the ground as well.  He may not be as fast as Smith, but fast is very overrated for a RB anyway.  You bring up the 3.6 ypc, but that is very misleading.  He&#8217;s been the one installed in the short yardage situations, and he has gotten it. If you run from the one yard line and score, your ypc goes down.  Have you not noticed him springing several great runs this preseason?  Everyone else has.  And by saying he shouldn&#8217;t get the job, then why would you give it to Blount?  What has he done in the preseason?  Are you going to give the job to Blount because of how he performed  2 years ago under a previous regime?  How does that make sense?  Putting Martin mainly on special teams is the single stupidest ideas in the history of ideas.  I&#8217;m shaking my head in embarrassment for you. </p>
<p>As for Mallett being a stud, heh?  Because he led a couple TD&#8217;s against guys you will be ordering burgers from in a week?  So now you want to get rid of a player who has a great season under his belt 2 years ago, for an unproven player? That&#8217;s a bit hypocritical don&#8217;t you think?  So that logic applies only to RB&#8217;s but not QB&#8217;s?   Freeman hasn&#8217;t looked great, but he hasn&#8217;t been nearly as bad as everyone is making him out to be.  He has no turnovers, and he has led our team to the end zone.  He had a couple drops last game which hurt his numbers.  Yes he made a couple bad throws, but that&#8217;s what preseason is for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1987558</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1987558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[does Blount pay for this site&#039;s domain fees or something?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does Blount pay for this site&#8217;s domain fees or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OAR</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1987366</link>
		<dc:creator>OAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1987366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pfft! Regular season in two weeks! We can rediscuss this then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pfft! Regular season in two weeks! We can rediscuss this then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architek</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1987285</link>
		<dc:creator>Architek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1987285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Joe two words. &quot;Tip Toeing&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Joe two words. &#8220;Tip Toeing&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Grande</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1987282</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Grande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1987282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Joe

    &quot;Why don’t they use Martin on kick offs and punt returns? Answer: He will get beat up.

Actually, the real answer is Michael Smith.

Can’t think of too many teams who have their No. 1 back return kicks.&quot;

I don&#039;t think you understood my comment. What I am saying is, why waste a roster spot by having two identical players? I don&#039;t see any difference between Smith and Martin, two small little running backs that run very low hiding behind the OL. The difference is Martin is 10LBS heavier and Smith is a little faster. Also, Martin is paid a lot more.

Give the #1 RB spot to LGB and pick one little Darren Sproles type. If you chose Martin, let him play special teams. Maybe, if the Rockstar is truly a genius, trade Martin for a couple starters. Maybe a quality RG and a starting DT and keep Smith who has less trade value. 

Smith and Martin on the same roster is redundant. Gaining 3.6 ypc in three preseason games will hardly unseat an experienced RB with a 5.3ypc
NFL career average in the real world.

Is Martin the bell cow, I&#039;m not seeing it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe</p>
<p>    &#8220;Why don’t they use Martin on kick offs and punt returns? Answer: He will get beat up.</p>
<p>Actually, the real answer is Michael Smith.</p>
<p>Can’t think of too many teams who have their No. 1 back return kicks.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you understood my comment. What I am saying is, why waste a roster spot by having two identical players? I don&#8217;t see any difference between Smith and Martin, two small little running backs that run very low hiding behind the OL. The difference is Martin is 10LBS heavier and Smith is a little faster. Also, Martin is paid a lot more.</p>
<p>Give the #1 RB spot to LGB and pick one little Darren Sproles type. If you chose Martin, let him play special teams. Maybe, if the Rockstar is truly a genius, trade Martin for a couple starters. Maybe a quality RG and a starting DT and keep Smith who has less trade value. </p>
<p>Smith and Martin on the same roster is redundant. Gaining 3.6 ypc in three preseason games will hardly unseat an experienced RB with a 5.3ypc<br />
NFL career average in the real world.</p>
<p>Is Martin the bell cow, I&#8217;m not seeing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brown Bag</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1987203</link>
		<dc:creator>Brown Bag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1987203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes Joe. thank you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes Joe. thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buc_The_World</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1987110</link>
		<dc:creator>Buc_The_World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1987110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People who claim that Martin didn&#039;t win starting job answer this question, what did Blount do to earn the starting job? From what I have seen Coach Schiano seems to be a fair man. These two looked pretty much equal to me, but if I had to go with 1 it would be Martin. Martin hits the hole with power and he has better vision than Blount. Blount is a beast and still needs a little more improvement, but until he can hit the hole with authority and do it consistently, he will be #2. As an undrafted free agent the burden is on you to prove that you are better than the first round draft pick, I don&#039;t care what you did in 2010, it&#039;s 2012 now. If Bount wants his job back, it&#039;s there for the taking, but don&#039;t say Martin didn&#039;t earn it. Also stop it with the &quot;Schiano just shouldn&#039;t hand Martin the Job&quot;, no one is complaining about the other first round draft pick being handed the job, though I still feel that Martin earned it fair and square and I was rooting for LGB to win the starting spot the whole time. Unfortunately for my expectations he fell fell short, but fortunately he is on the team and we have two damn good RB&#039;s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who claim that Martin didn&#8217;t win starting job answer this question, what did Blount do to earn the starting job? From what I have seen Coach Schiano seems to be a fair man. These two looked pretty much equal to me, but if I had to go with 1 it would be Martin. Martin hits the hole with power and he has better vision than Blount. Blount is a beast and still needs a little more improvement, but until he can hit the hole with authority and do it consistently, he will be #2. As an undrafted free agent the burden is on you to prove that you are better than the first round draft pick, I don&#8217;t care what you did in 2010, it&#8217;s 2012 now. If Bount wants his job back, it&#8217;s there for the taking, but don&#8217;t say Martin didn&#8217;t earn it. Also stop it with the &#8220;Schiano just shouldn&#8217;t hand Martin the Job&#8221;, no one is complaining about the other first round draft pick being handed the job, though I still feel that Martin earned it fair and square and I was rooting for LGB to win the starting spot the whole time. Unfortunately for my expectations he fell fell short, but fortunately he is on the team and we have two damn good RB&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BucfaninMi</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1987015</link>
		<dc:creator>BucfaninMi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1987015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait till the games count, we&#039;ll see a different LGB!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait till the games count, we&#8217;ll see a different LGB!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas 2.2</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1986944</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas 2.2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1986944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently nearly 230 is small for a RB - huh?

Schiano gave blount the advantage to start the preseason - Blount got spanked fair and square and now he is the number 2. We are fortunate to have a capable backup at the position.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently nearly 230 is small for a RB &#8211; huh?</p>
<p>Schiano gave blount the advantage to start the preseason &#8211; Blount got spanked fair and square and now he is the number 2. We are fortunate to have a capable backup at the position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: princespanky</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1986913</link>
		<dc:creator>princespanky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1986913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Fernando

Did you just say that Doug Martin was too small. Oh man that makes my day.

Dude, he has no neck; he might be short but he is far from small. Joe let this guy know about how Doug Martin is built from your first hand experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fernando</p>
<p>Did you just say that Doug Martin was too small. Oh man that makes my day.</p>
<p>Dude, he has no neck; he might be short but he is far from small. Joe let this guy know about how Doug Martin is built from your first hand experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1986841</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1986841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe! His biggest problemis fumbles! If he doesn&#039;t he is great.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe! His biggest problemis fumbles! If he doesn&#8217;t he is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bucfanjeff</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159&#038;cpage=1#comment-1986839</link>
		<dc:creator>bucfanjeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=72159#comment-1986839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Dutcher, above I never said he couldn&#039;t catch...I said he&#039;s not good at pass protection..aka blitz pickup. He is also not good at change of direction when the hole isn&#039;t there and dances or hesistates. I like Blount, he has a place, but Martin is your starter and the better, more complete back. I think YOU need to watch the games...my vision is fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dutcher, above I never said he couldn&#8217;t catch&#8230;I said he&#8217;s not good at pass protection..aka blitz pickup. He is also not good at change of direction when the hole isn&#8217;t there and dances or hesistates. I like Blount, he has a place, but Martin is your starter and the better, more complete back. I think YOU need to watch the games&#8230;my vision is fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.joebucsfan.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=72159 ) in 0.19161 seconds, on May 20th, 2013 at 7:38 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 20th, 2013 at 8:38 am UTC -->