<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plan On Lots Of Changes At Lower Cost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joebucsfan.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=62547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:28:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=2#comment-1514233</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1514233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, it&#039;s because the CBA was in limbo and who in their right mind would spend a bunch of money on long term contracts when the future benefit of that expenditure was in doubt?? No smart businessman.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s because the CBA was in limbo and who in their right mind would spend a bunch of money on long term contracts when the future benefit of that expenditure was in doubt?? No smart businessman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capt.Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=2#comment-1512575</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt.Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1512575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bobby- no, they don&#039;t
The salary minimum doesnt go into effect until 2013. Then, it is based on a four year scale. They only have to spend 80% the first two years to be compliant

Do you think that it&#039;s an accident, that we have had the lowest player payroll, and lowest paid coaching staff, in the NFL, the last four years?
Lowest player payroll for last 7 years?

It&#039;s not an accident, a mistake, or an oversight.

It is a well orchestrated strategy. Which Dom is now the chief official .


NFL football is a product. Not a religion, not a political affiliation
The Glazers continue to give us the very cheapest product they possibly can, and are making Maximum profit. They have done so for nearly a decade

While I admire your trying to be positive, I&#039;m afraid you are ignoring the truth, history, and the facts in the matter.
It&#039;s blind faith, which is what they are counting on, as they continue selling us Spam, and telling us it&#039;s Prime rib!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby- no, they don&#8217;t<br />
The salary minimum doesnt go into effect until 2013. Then, it is based on a four year scale. They only have to spend 80% the first two years to be compliant</p>
<p>Do you think that it&#8217;s an accident, that we have had the lowest player payroll, and lowest paid coaching staff, in the NFL, the last four years?<br />
Lowest player payroll for last 7 years?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not an accident, a mistake, or an oversight.</p>
<p>It is a well orchestrated strategy. Which Dom is now the chief official .</p>
<p>NFL football is a product. Not a religion, not a political affiliation<br />
The Glazers continue to give us the very cheapest product they possibly can, and are making Maximum profit. They have done so for nearly a decade</p>
<p>While I admire your trying to be positive, I&#8217;m afraid you are ignoring the truth, history, and the facts in the matter.<br />
It&#8217;s blind faith, which is what they are counting on, as they continue selling us Spam, and telling us it&#8217;s Prime rib!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=2#comment-1511697</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1511697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really don&#039;t understand all this salary cap talk. THEY HAVE TO SPEND MONEY. Is that so difficult to comprehend?? Now, that doesn&#039;t mean they have to listen to their fan base and spend stupidly. They realize that they need help but primarily they need depth. If we can keep our D-line healthy we have a solid front 4. However, that&#039;s a big IF so we need depth. We need two corners. We will probably get one in the first round and another in FA. With T-Jack, Grimm, &amp; Black we are pretty good at safety but we&#039;ll probably bring in some competition there also. 

The greatest need is LB in my opinion. I expect us to bring in a vet MLB in FA and draft another OLB. Hayes will be gone and Quincy will be used as backup unless he begins to excel under the newly applied pressure that this coaching staff will bring. 

The cure to all problems is winning and don&#039;t think that the Glazers aren&#039;t aware of that. Doesn&#039;t matter how pessimistic the fans are, how empty the seats are,....start to win and the fans get back on board and the seats start to fill up. I believe the Glazers are in it to win it and I don&#039;t expect them to spend in FA just to please the fans...I expect them to spend in FA because they want to win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t understand all this salary cap talk. THEY HAVE TO SPEND MONEY. Is that so difficult to comprehend?? Now, that doesn&#8217;t mean they have to listen to their fan base and spend stupidly. They realize that they need help but primarily they need depth. If we can keep our D-line healthy we have a solid front 4. However, that&#8217;s a big IF so we need depth. We need two corners. We will probably get one in the first round and another in FA. With T-Jack, Grimm, &amp; Black we are pretty good at safety but we&#8217;ll probably bring in some competition there also. </p>
<p>The greatest need is LB in my opinion. I expect us to bring in a vet MLB in FA and draft another OLB. Hayes will be gone and Quincy will be used as backup unless he begins to excel under the newly applied pressure that this coaching staff will bring. </p>
<p>The cure to all problems is winning and don&#8217;t think that the Glazers aren&#8217;t aware of that. Doesn&#8217;t matter how pessimistic the fans are, how empty the seats are,&#8230;.start to win and the fans get back on board and the seats start to fill up. I believe the Glazers are in it to win it and I don&#8217;t expect them to spend in FA just to please the fans&#8230;I expect them to spend in FA because they want to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BamBamBuc</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=2#comment-1510722</link>
		<dc:creator>BamBamBuc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1510722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There will be a team specific spending floor of 89% of the salary cap from 2013 onward, but it will be accounted for in two four-year periods: 2013-2016 and 2017-2020.

That will be the key.  They must average &quot;at least&quot; 89% of the cap over the 4 year period of 2013 - 2016.  That really means they can be at 80% for a year or two, then at the cap the last couple and still comply.  So, they can still hold the bottom of the payroll line until 2015 if they so choose.  Doing so will force the spending in 2015 and 2016 though.  That still could mean 3 years of low payroll.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be a team specific spending floor of 89% of the salary cap from 2013 onward, but it will be accounted for in two four-year periods: 2013-2016 and 2017-2020.</p>
<p>That will be the key.  They must average &#8220;at least&#8221; 89% of the cap over the 4 year period of 2013 &#8211; 2016.  That really means they can be at 80% for a year or two, then at the cap the last couple and still comply.  So, they can still hold the bottom of the payroll line until 2015 if they so choose.  Doing so will force the spending in 2015 and 2016 though.  That still could mean 3 years of low payroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macabee</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=2#comment-1510612</link>
		<dc:creator>Macabee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 06:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1510612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2013 salary floor is not as unforgiving as Cap&#039;n Tim suggests, but he is right. It is a rolling average and not a hard floor as everyone seems to think!

http://www.bucsnation.com/2012/2/1/2763259/spending-and-the-cba-salary-floor-does-not-go-into-effect-until-2013]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2013 salary floor is not as unforgiving as Cap&#8217;n Tim suggests, but he is right. It is a rolling average and not a hard floor as everyone seems to think!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bucsnation.com/2012/2/1/2763259/spending-and-the-cba-salary-floor-does-not-go-into-effect-until-2013" rel="nofollow">http://www.bucsnation.com/2012/2/1/2763259/spending-and-the-cba-salary-floor-does-not-go-into-effect-until-2013</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=2#comment-1510603</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 06:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1510603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I went to high school with ms. watson.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Details, FIRETHECANNONS, details!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I went to high school with ms. watson.</p></blockquote>
<p>Details, FIRETHECANNONS, details!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FIRETHECANNONS</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=2#comment-1510536</link>
		<dc:creator>FIRETHECANNONS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 05:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1510536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to high school with ms. watson. Her parents live right down the road from me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to high school with ms. watson. Her parents live right down the road from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Dutcher</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=2#comment-1510444</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Dutcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 04:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1510444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Capt. Tim
The reason I mentioned center was the link below. The guy reminded me of Sapp&#039;s attitude.

 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/29/david-molk-im-the-best-center-in-the-draft-and-its-stupid-to-say-im-not/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Capt. Tim<br />
The reason I mentioned center was the link below. The guy reminded me of Sapp&#8217;s attitude.</p>
<p> <a href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/29/david-molk-im-the-best-center-in-the-draft-and-its-stupid-to-say-im-not/" rel="nofollow">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/29/david-molk-im-the-best-center-in-the-draft-and-its-stupid-to-say-im-not/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Dutcher</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=2#comment-1510440</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Dutcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1510440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ FlBoy84
I was talking strictly in the year the coach came in, which is what Clayton inferred.

Over 2-3 years is certainly possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ FlBoy84<br />
I was talking strictly in the year the coach came in, which is what Clayton inferred.</p>
<p>Over 2-3 years is certainly possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlBoy84</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=2#comment-1510389</link>
		<dc:creator>FlBoy84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1510389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Matthew,

LOL, Always think the same thing when I see him, except it&#039;s the CryptKeeper and Al Davis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matthew,</p>
<p>LOL, Always think the same thing when I see him, except it&#8217;s the CryptKeeper and Al Davis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=2#comment-1510357</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1510357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it just me or does John Clayton look creepier and creepier each passing year? He seriously looks like he&#039;s a cross between the crypt keeper &amp; a decaying alien; plus he has some weirdo pony tail on top of it all. He literally freaks me out now when he pops up on ESPN.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does John Clayton look creepier and creepier each passing year? He seriously looks like he&#8217;s a cross between the crypt keeper &amp; a decaying alien; plus he has some weirdo pony tail on top of it all. He literally freaks me out now when he pops up on ESPN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gotbbucs</title>
		<link>http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547&#038;cpage=1#comment-1510355</link>
		<dc:creator>gotbbucs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=62547#comment-1510355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sure the bottom half of our roster will look very different this year, but there absolutely needs to be at least 5 new starters combined on both sides of the ball. Probably two on offense and three on defense. It&#039;s going to take probably a third of our available cap space just to build depth behind our starters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure the bottom half of our roster will look very different this year, but there absolutely needs to be at least 5 new starters combined on both sides of the ball. Probably two on offense and three on defense. It&#8217;s going to take probably a third of our available cap space just to build depth behind our starters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.joebucsfan.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=62547 ) in 0.24567 seconds, on May 19th, 2013 at 10:53 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2013 at 11:53 am UTC -->