Comments on: Frank Okam Cut

By: Joshua Licht

Joshua Licht — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:19:35 +0000

Okam hasn’t done anything all year. I get it.

By: Bobby

Bobby — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:03:08 +0000

Well, well….there actually WAS a reason for the move. See how silly some of you are with all the conjecture and jumping to conclusions??? See why we’re sooooooooo glad that the front office doesn’t let the fans dictate their decision making?

By: Ed

Ed — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:52:01 +0000

McCargo is number 79

By: Pete Dutcher

Pete Dutcher — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:47:34 +0000

Ah…I should have read the comments first.

BamBam, I was about to say that if it had to do with an Okam injury, why sign DE instead of DT? But then I read furthur on.

The Bennett injury is bad news of course, but at least it is not a season ending injury.

I’m surprised an injury on Albert hasn’t been announced. Him getting that stinger in the last game was a scary thing. I instantly thought “Well, that was a waste of a signing…”

But them Albert went back in. I don’t know about you guys, but that impressed me. The old Albert would have stayed on the sidelines. He showed leadership in doing what he did.

Kind of makes me want to think he actually is changed. If he keeps on playing like he is, there is a great chance he’s here to stay.

On Miller…
drbinshore is spot on. Miller is better than he is given credit for. But the likely reason he was kept over Okam is experience and continuity.

Miller has proven he is durable…just what you want in a backup. And I’m not convinced he can’t be good at the other DT spot.

By: Pete Dutcher

Pete Dutcher — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:27:24 +0000

My theory is that they are planning to sign someone…a LB or CD…maybe a RB (though I doubt it).

Much as I hate to see Okam go, this could wind up being a good thing. Ples, if no one claims him he can go back on the squad.

By: macabee

macabee — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:29:06 +0000

OK, somebody figure this one out. Te’o Neisheim was given #50, usually a linebacker number. Anybody want to chance a theory? Oh, and there are numbers in the nineties not used. While you’re at it, Why does Haynesworth and McCargo have the same #95?

By: adam from ny

adam from ny — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:50:24 +0000

scotty reynolds seems to navigating a sinking ship over there too…that site has all but completely fell off…no podcasts….no charlie…no wolf…no nothin”’………the pewter submarine is about to go under and duke took like 3 years of premium pay from me with no kind of resiprocity before his mag went digital….ganked for a 3 year subscription 105 dollar deal right before he killed off the mag and went to the computer submarine…when i see that guy he will be forking over a c-note to me fo-sure…..adam from ny

By: adam from ny

adam from ny — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:43:19 +0000

aw joe i thought it was a good post….entertainment is all it was…i tettered on the edge but never really went over the cliff….ok i will fall back in future posts…i was just palying around joe…go easy brother go easy….the kid will come correct for the rest of the season.

By: Capt.Tim

Capt.Tim — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:31:53 +0000

Nate- if you are going to “question forever”, what the team does with a 3rd string tackle and a practice squad player, then you might wanna step away from the keys for a while! That’s fanatical, even for this bunch, lol!

By: adam from ny

adam from ny — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:22:00 +0000

nate i promise you that you will not think about frank okam forever….you will forget he existed before you know it, unless you live in some tiny buccaneers bubble (like me and john travolta)….and yes roy “no skills” mills somehow dodged the turkey axe.

forever bucs fan — adam from ny

By: adam from ny

adam from ny — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:18:20 +0000

i guess someone really is going home for the holidays……hmm….and not coming back

By: adam from ny

adam from ny — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:17:03 +0000

don’t yall wish it was quincy blizzy talking all the lockeroom ish instead??

adam from the zoo