Comments on: Who Does Bisaccia Really Want?

By: Dave

Dave — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:00:46 +0000

I think Spurlock stays, he adds value as a WR. Stovall does not, Briscoe has taken his role (or will take it)

Williams, Benn, Stroughter, Briscoe, Spurlock
If they keep 5 it may be Preston, not sure if they think his quickness and speed will equate to anything.
If they go sign someone else, that tells me Preston is gone too

By: wade

wade — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:51:05 +0000

Norv Turner is boring as #$@#

By: BigMacAttack

BigMacAttack — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 02:29:55 +0000

It is what it is. I hope the Bucs sign Nnamdi. I hope they can keep Hayward but these players should beware of “greener pastures” that aren’t always that. Bisaccia is not a head coach and doesn’t have that much pull. It may not even work out for him there. He could get into it with the GM(ahole) and get run off, or leave in a year. Never follow your boss to another gig unless he truly is the Boss, because you may end up alone on the street. I would wait a year if at all possible.

By: Espo

Espo — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:52:22 +0000

Stovall is a very good special teams player, aside from ONE play. With that being said, I can’t make a very strong argument for him taking up a WR slot on our depth chart.

Spurlock is a keeper. He is warping his game to that of a legitimate receiving threat, and is one of the better return men in the game.

If Benn is healthy and Parker and Briscoe pan out, I think Stroughter might be the odd man out. With 3 or 4 TEs on our roster along with that hybrid Lorig, I don’t see Stroughter or Stovall (who I’d keep between the two) making the team this year.

By: Bucbeliever

Bucbeliever — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:19:39 +0000

I’d like to keep Spurlock…he always seems to allude our NFC South foes. Hayward was showing some good stuff last year and think he’s an injury or two away from becoming another Buc thrust into that D. With a reduced off season (should this lockout go on longer) I wouldn’t give up any defensive players who are familiar w/ the system.

So…

Stovall – yes
Spurlock – no
Hayward – no

GO BUCS!

By: Mauha Deeb

Mauha Deeb — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:53:03 +0000

I’m with Leighroy. Though, I’m a bit iffy about taking a chance with another KR.

By: Macabee

Macabee — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:50:51 +0000

Not a problem. We will pay them (Chargers) to take Stovall. Spurlock is not eligible under the proposed CBA ( see Steven Holder’s comments). I read that they are interested in Quincy Black, not Adam Hayward – I’m pretty sure not both. I don’t think either would go if they got comparable offers from the Bucs.

By: Leighroy

Leighroy — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:54:18 +0000

Bisaccia can have all 3 of ‘em.

The charger’s have a hole on their team for a “phantom tackler” ever since “Cro!” left town.

Hayward has been a nice special teams player, but his spot is probably ripe for a rookie or a Mark Dominik practice squad steal to step up into at this point.

Spurlock, I will miss, but we have Straughter, Briscoe and Parker as backups who all deserve to see more playing time, and you don’t lose too much by going to any of those 3 on the field, compared to Spurlock. And while he did produce as a KR, (“Run Michael Run” will live on immortally as long as the Bucs are a franchise) at least one of those 3 could easily take a shot at that job as well.