Comments on: Draft Breakdown: Quarterbacks http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133 Just another WordPress weblog Sat, 18 May 2013 20:13:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Weneeddefense http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-352400 Weneeddefense Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:33:17 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-352400 tldr

]]> By: FuNkYxMuNkEy http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-351804 FuNkYxMuNkEy Sat, 09 Apr 2011 04:29:34 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-351804 And before people say trades can’t be made involving players…deals can be made behind the scenes and agreed to without making the trade “official”. SF would pick who we told them to. And we would make the pick they want at 20. Then wait for the lockout to be over. And presto…we have either Peterson or Quinn. Either way, that position would be fixed for atleast 7-10 years barring injury!

]]> By: FuNkYxMuNkEy http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-351797 FuNkYxMuNkEy Sat, 09 Apr 2011 04:27:04 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-351797 I know this is a little off topic, but…we should trade JJ, the 20th pick, and a 4th or 5th rounder to SF for the #7 pick overall. IF Patrick Peterson or Robert Quinn is still there at 7. Our D-Line would be so sick if we could add Quinn. And Peterson is straight nasty as a cover man and return man. Wow!!! Thats an amazing thought to have him in our secondary!! Him or Quinn would be worth that trade ALL DAY LONG!!!
Then for our back up QB problem. We should draft Colin Kaepernick in the 3rd round. In the second round we should take the best available CB or best DE left. Depending on which position we draft in the 1st round.

]]> By: MichiganBucsFan http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-351574 MichiganBucsFan Sat, 09 Apr 2011 02:06:18 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-351574 Newton is not more athletic that Michael Vick, lets get that straight right now

]]> By: BigMacAttack http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-351300 BigMacAttack Fri, 08 Apr 2011 22:33:15 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-351300 Cam Newton is the only one I’d take over JJ, but I don’t believe Newton will be a franchise QB. I don’t believe Cam has the intelligence or moxie to be an elite QB in the NFL. No, I can’t back it up, it’s a hunch. He looked flustered at times against the Ducks and when he speaks, I don’t like the things coming out of his mouth. I still think he will be a starter, will make big plays at times, but will also choke repeatedly in the clutch. I think it’s all about the Paycheck with Newton.

]]> By: Pete Dutcher http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-351210 Pete Dutcher Fri, 08 Apr 2011 21:34:33 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-351210 Even with his professional experience? I think JJ can become a starting quarterback in the right system. He has good enough arm strength. All he needs is a patient hand to develop him. I think he might be getting that here, but he also won’t get the opportunity here.

]]> By: Camby http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-351138 Camby Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:50:03 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-351138 I’d say the JJ cutoff would be around Dalton or Stanzi. After that, I think JJ’s arm strength and speed still make him more intriging than Greg McElroy, or Stanzi for that matter.

]]> By: Pete Dutcher http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-351126 Pete Dutcher Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:39:56 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-351126 Here’s a question…

…which of these quarterbacks would you take over Josh Johnson?

]]> By: Pete Dutcher http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-351043 Pete Dutcher Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:52:37 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-351043

Pete I Says:

April 8th, 2011 at 1:26 pm
Well I am certainly glad the Bucs don’t need a QB in this draft. I’ll keep Freeman for now thanks very much.

Its funny that the first 15 teams in the draft almost all have QB issues or outright need a QB. From there on the rest of the teams are mostly pretty set. The league does seem to be QB driven.

Well, we can at least hope they all are dumb enough to gamble on the QBs this year…that way the chances of us getting hte right guy go up!

becks Says:

April 8th, 2011 at 12:47 pm
not trying to be a dick but i thought this site was aimed at buc news. last time i checked we have a quarterback that we drafted 2 years ago and hes pretty dam good. lets spot light some positions that we might actually draft.
Thats what id like to see atleast. i couldnt care less about this qb draft class.

You are right in stating that we already have a quarterback, but by analyzing all the positions, we can get an idea of how our own draft will play out.

]]> By: Jonny http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-351026 Jonny Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:34:41 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-351026 Thanks Jonny. Feel free to email Joe with tips. Don’t want to threadjack Justin’s work. — Joe

]]> By: IMHO http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-350737 IMHO Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:28:01 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-350737 This yr QB’s are full of uncertainty. There is not 1 safe, sure pick at QB. Every single one of them has problems ranging from injury, drug usage, payola, offensive system, accuracy or turtle syndrome(Ryan Mallett).

]]> By: Pete I http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133&cpage=1#comment-350736 Pete I Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:26:14 +0000 http://www.joebucsfan.com/?p=46133#comment-350736 Well I am certainly glad the Bucs don’t need a QB in this draft. I’ll keep Freeman for now thanks very much.

Its funny that the first 15 teams in the draft almost all have QB issues or outright need a QB. From there on the rest of the teams are mostly pretty set. The league does seem to be QB driven.

How much has the spread of the “spread” offense in college hurt finding NFL franchise passers and runners too? Seems like fewer and fewer QB’s are “NFL ready” these days with some exceptions.

]]>