Signing Burress Would Be A Bad MoveMay 29th, 2009
As Joe has pointed out, going after Plexiglass Burress is beyond dumb. Joe is not alone is his assessment. Also in agreement are Adam Schein and Solomon Wilcots, co-hosts of “The Blitz” heard weekdays on Sirius NFL Radio. They opened today’s show with Burress-to-the-Bucs talk.
Schein was just amazed that Raheem the Dream would covet Burress so openingly. Wilcots seemed equally puzzled but thought the Bucs need to worry about other positions before they begin more lusting over the punk Burress.
Adam Schein: I can’t deny the talent of Burress but for a team in transition, I don’t know if you want the attitude that Burress will bring. Burress will want the ball. Winslow will want the ball. Bryant, despite what he told us the other day, will want the ball. Then you have five quarterbacks in Tampa Bay.
Solomon Wilcots: The problem with too many quarterbacks is that you don’t have one.
AS: Could you see the four-win Bucs in December trotting out Burress, Bryant, Winslow and Freeman? I’m rooting for the guys in Tampa. I like the guys in Tampa. I just don’t get what they are doing.
As Joe explained in much greater detail, no one knows when (or if) Burress will next play. Likely not this year, maybe not next year, perhaps not until 2012; nobody knows? So why is Dream getting all worked up over the noted NRA spokesman as if Dream just watched a Rachel Watson video?